Cookham Parish Council

 

COOKHAM PARISH COUNCIL

 

Minutes of a Meeting of the PLANNING COMMITTEE held at the

Community Room on Tuesday, 19th June 2007 commencing at 7.30 pm

 

PRESENT:            Cllr H.J. Woodbridge (Chairman),

Cllrs M. Brar (part time), P. Brockwell, M. Coker, D. Fry, G. Harris,

M. Innes, M-L. Kellaway, R. Piercey, D. Ricardo, Jean Stretton and

John Stretton.

 

Also present:            Nick Meakin (Maidenhead Advertiser), Nick Brunetti (Bucks Free Press), PC Val de Haan and thirty-four members of public.

_________________________________________________________________________

OPEN FORUM: The Chairman opened the meeting to explain to members of the public that this meeting was not a special Crime Forum, as had been incorrectly reported in the Maidenhead Advertiser. This was a normal Parish Council Planning Meeting with an Open Forum which would normally last just 15 minutes. On this occasion the Parish Council had moved a later meeting to enable them to increase the Open Forum session to 30 minutes. The Chairman then asked whether there were any members of the public who were attending to speak on planning matters. Mr Soden of Berries Road spoke of his attempts to erect a wall around his property to replace his hedge. He said that the grounds for refusal laid down by the Planning Inspector was one of caution concerning the risk of flooding. This criteria had now been answered by the Environment Agency and he hoped the Parish Council would be able to support his application.

            The Chairman then opened the session to other members of the public saying that the problems of crime were nothing new to the Parish Council. The Council frequently met with the police to discuss measures that could be taken within the parish including the installation of low lighting around the war memorial; CCTV on the Alfred Major Recreation Ground. Subtle improvements to street lighting around the parish had also been completed during the last year. The Chairman also said that the Parish Council could only follow the judicial process regarding the idea of hiring a private security firm to patrol Cookham streets.

            Several people spoke of their concerns regarding parking in Cookham village; parking tickets; burglary from cars and mindless acts of vandalism. The theme from the residents was that there was not enough protection. PC de Haan mentioned the possibility of the parish purchasing a petard camera which could be attached to a street light column and moved around the parish. This would be used in conjunction with a false camera. Brian Feldon’s suggestion for AA Committee TO DO.

            The session closed with PC Val de Haan agreeing to arrange a separate Crime Forum for members of the public. The Planning Meeting started at 8.15pm.

 

1.                  APOLOGIES AND DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST: Apologies were received from Cllrs Barnes, Brar and Wellman. Cllr John Stretton gave apologies for Cllr Hewitt. All Cllrs declared a personal interest in Pln Appn 07/01431 and Cllr Piercey declared a prejudicial interest. Cllr Innes declared a personal interest in Pln Appn 07/01406.

Cllr John Stretton declared an interest as a member of the Borough Planning Committee and reserved the right to change his mind at a later stage. He also declared a prejudical interest in Pln Appn 07/01493. Cllr Jean Stretton declared a personal interest in this item. 

 

2.                  PLANS CONSIDERED & DISCUSSED:

 

Planning

Ref:

Current Planning Applications

Decision

07/01405

 

(23/05/07)

Realignment of pavement to include raising of kerb and adjustment of pavement levels on junction of Sutton Road and Cookham High Street.

STANLEY SPENCER GALLERY, High Street, Cookham.

Stanley Spencer Gallery

NO OBJECTION – Refer to RBWM Highways Department.

VOTE: IN FAVOUR = UNANIMOUS

07/01406

 

(23/05/07)

Two storey extension incorporating car port and garage with insertion of two dormers to north east elevation.

1 FORMOSA COURT, Mill Lane, Cookham. Hamlet Properties

(Similar 07/00272 was refused 22/3/07)

OBJECTION – Contrary to Policies F1 – (no Flood Risk Assessment), Policy GB4 – over-development in the Green Belt and N2 - Setting of the Thames.

VOTE: IN FAVOUR = 9, ABSTENTION = 2

07/01413

 

(23/05/07)

Installation of timber cladding to one side of an existing barn.

HARDINGS FARM, Hills Lane, Cookham Dean.

P. D. Richards

 

Cookham Parish Council request that this application be decided at the Borough Planning Meeting unless the Case Officer agrees with the decision of the Parish Council.

OBJECTION – Contrary to Policy GB4 – inappropriate development in the Green Belt and adjacent to the Conservation Area. Un-neighbourly. Retrospective – request Enforcement Officer ensures that barn reverts back to previous appearance. Should never be used for any commercial activity on this site.

VOTE: IN FAVOUR = UNANIMOUS.

07/01417

 

(25/05/07)

Single storey side/rear extension verandah roof to side and canopies over 3 no. first floor balconies.

THE THATCH, Dean Lane, Cookham Dean.

Mr B. Tickle and Ms S. Hill

OBJECTION – Contrary to Policy GB4 –over-development in the Green Belt.

VOTE: IN FAVOUR = 9, AGAINST = 1, ABSTENTION = 1.

07/01423

 

(25/05/07)

Single storey rear extension.

2 HILLGROVE COTTAGES, Lower Road, Cookham Rise.

Mr and Mrs P. Turvey

NO OBJECTION

VOTE: IN FAVOUR = 10 ABSTENTION = 1

07/01431

 

(29/05/07)

Certificate of Lawfulness for the proposed installation of 2 no. solar panels to rear roof slope.

FAIRHILL COTTAGE, Warners Hill, Cookham Dean.

Mr Roger Piercey

NO OBJECTION

VOTE = UNANIMOUS

07/01443

 

(29/05/07)

Two storey rear and single storey rear extension.

OLD DANIELS, Popes Lane, Cookham Dean.

W. A. Forbes

Cookham Parish Council request that this application be decided at the Borough Planning Meeting unless the Case Officer agrees with the decision of the Parish Council.

OBJECTION – Contrary to Policies GB4 and CA2 - inappropriate development and design. Refer to Conservation Officer.

VOTE: IN FAVOUR = UNANIMOUS.

 

07/01449

 

(29/05/07)

Extension to existing decking and replacement O.D. (Starter’s) Box.

COOKHAM REACH SAILING CLUB, Berries Road, Cookham.

Commodore and Executive Committee

NO OBJECTION – Request that sides are not enclosed under decking.

VOTE: IN FAVOUR = UNANIMOUS

 

  07/01451

 

 (30/05/07)

Construction of a three storey side extension to form new staircase and lift shaft together with four no. bay windows at ground floor level.

HARWOOD HOUSE NURSING HOME, Spring Lane, Cookham Dean.

Harwood House Nursing Home

NO OBJECTION The Parish Council request that consideration be made to enhancing the face of the building with window lines or mouldings to break up the plain wall.

VOTE: IN FAVOUR = 10 AGAINST = 1

07/01466

 

(30/05/07)

Dropped kerb for vehicular access.

2 CANNON DOWN COTTAGES, Maidenhead Road, Cookham.

Sara Jane Boulter

NO OBJECTION – providing it meets with guidelines laid down by RBWM Highways.

VOTE: IN FAVOUR = UNANIMOUS

07/01474

 

(30/05/07)

Part two storey part single storey side and single storey front extensions and erection of entrance gates.

FAIRLAWNE, Mill Lane, Cookham

Mr and Mrs J. Sheehan

OBJECTION – Contrary to Policy F1 – no Flood Risk Assessment.

VOTE: IN FAVOUR = 8 ABSTENTION = 3

07/01493

 

(01/06/07)

Erection of front boundary wall.

DEANCROFT, Berries Road, Cookham.

Mr A. Soden

(9 letters of support)

NO OBJECTION

VOTE: IN FAVOUR = 7 AGAINST = 2 ABSTENTION = 1

Cllr Ricardo requested that this be called in for Panel but the motion carried is NO OBJECTION.

 

07/01500

 

(04/06/07)

Single storey side extension with accommodation in loft space, single storey rear extension with extension to roof slope and new front porch.

PAGETS, Kings Lane, Cookham Dean.

Mr and Mrs Hollingsworth

OBJECTION – Contrary to Policy GB4 – over-development in the Green Belt.

VOTE: IN FAVOUR = 6, AGAINST = 3, ABSTENTION = 2.

NB. Cllr John Stretton proposed No Objection but no seconder.

07/01504

 

(04/06/07)

Rear conservatory.

BARN CROFT, Lightlands Lane, Cookham.

Mr and Mrs Duffield

NO OBJECTION

VOTE: UNANIMOUS

Planning

Ref:

Works to Trees in Conservation Area

Decision

07/01409

 

(24/05/07)

Notification to fell 2 Cypressus.

DUNCRYNE, 5 Vicarage Close, Cookham.

Mr and Mrs Bridgeman

NO OBJECTION

VOTE: UNANIMOUS

Planning

Ref:

Current Appeals

Planning

Policies

Decision

06/00451/ENF

Notice 1.  The erection of a link building.

Notice 2.  The construction of a manege.

SEPTEMBER GRANGE, Terrys Lane, Cookham.

Mr R Overall and Mrs J Overall.

A Public Enquiry is set for 23rd October at 10.00 am in the Desborough Suite 2 and 3 , Town Hall, Maidenhead.

Green Belt (GB1-GB11)

Area of Special Landscape Importance (N1)

 

Planning Ref:

Appeal Decision

Decision

06/01362

Construction of a 3 bedroom detached dwelling.

LAND AT 1 ALANDALE COTTAGES, Station Road, Cookham Rise.

Mr R. Leighton

APPEAL DISMISSED – Contrary to Policies DG3, IMP1 – RBWM Local Plan.

Planning Ref:

Planning Decisions

Decision

07/00801

Construction of a pair of four bedroom semi-detached houses with block of four no. replacement garages to rear following demolition of existing dwelling.

BRAMLEY, High Road, C’ham Rise.

Countryside Designs

PERMITTED

07/00960

Certification of lawfulness to determine whether a rear dormer in connection with a loft conversion is lawful.

12 BROOM HILL, Cookham Rise.

Mr P. Davey

CERTIFICATE GRANTED

07/00990

Part two storey part first floor part single storey side extension.

MULBERRY HOUSE, Church Road, Cookham dean.

Mr D. C. Ingram

PERMITTED

07/00991

Demolition of an unlisted detached outbuilding in a conservation area.

MULBERRY HOUSE, Church Road, Cookham Dean.

Mr D C Ingram

APPLICATION WITHDRWAN ON 30 May 2007

07/01116

Notification to reduce height of 2 Eucalyptus.

WARNERS, Dean Lane, Cookham.

Mrs Kathleen Wallen

NO OBJECTION – REDUCE IN HEIGHT UP TO 50%

07/01033

Single storey side (north) and rear (west) extensions and loft conversion with rear (west) and front (east) dormers and pitched roof over existing garage.

BRUNSWICK HOUSE, The Pound, Cookham.

Mr Charles C. M. Knocker

PERMITTED

07/00991

Demolition of an unlisted detached outbuilding in a conservation area.

MULBERRY HOUSE, Church Road, Cookham Dean.

Mr D.C. Ingram

APPLICATION WITHDRAWN ON 30TH MAY 2007.

 

 

3. TO DISCUSS ANY MEASURES THE COUNCIL COULD TAKE TO IMPROVE THE SAFETY OF COOKHAM STATION AND HIGH ROAD AREAS IN COOKHAM RISE: The Parish Council discussed their ongoing work with the police in order to fight crime. Various initiatives had been undertaken over the past few years but the key was to persuade residents to form a Neighbourhood Action Group (NAG) to aid the work of the police. Cllr Brockwell said that a consultation carried out some years ago for street lighting in High Road had been rejected by residents. She proposed that it would be a timely exercise to carry out again. The item would be put on the next meeting of the Adoptive Acts Committee. It was also suggested to make contact with British Transport Police regarding any measures that could be taken on land owned by the railway. The Councillors also noted reports in the press regarding a possible move to start charging for parking at Cookham. This would drive commuters’ cars into the side roads.

 

 

                                                                                                           

                                                                                                                                    473

The Chairman then asked the Councillors’ permission to bring PC Val De Haan back into the meeting. PC de Haan said that although the figures show a fall in crime, the recent spate of arson is new to Cookham. There was a short discussion on the petard cameras. They cost around £7,000 and can the information can be downloaded direct to the Parish Office. Each adaptor costs around £250. Crime Reduction Supervisor Peter Bennett has more information. It was suggested that the British Transport Police may contribute. The three actions agreed were to: 1. Contact British Transport Police re: petard cameras; 2. Carry out a consultation re: lighting in High Road; 3. Consult Peter Bennett.

 

3.                  CHAIRMANS SUBMISSIONS – There were no submissions.

 

The Meeting closed at 9.40pm.

home    top of page You may need to click more than onceback    any suggestions