![]() ![]() |
|
COOKHAM PARISH COUNCIL Minutes
of a Meeting of the PLANNING COMMITTEE held at the Community
Room on Tuesday, 6th April 2004 commencing at 7.30 pm PRESENT:
Cllr H.J. Woodbridge (Acting Chairman)
Cllrs P. Brockwell, M.
Coker, S. Fairlie,
A. Hay, G. Harris, A.
Prichard, M.Wellman and S. Saintclair-Abbott. In Attendance:
Cllrs M. Brar and D. Ricardo (RBWM), Kris Mullins (Maidenhead
Advertiser) and
15 members of the public. OPEN FORUM: 1.
Mr D. Fry of Spencers Lane enquired when the road surface of Dean
Lane would be repaired following the completion of the Mains Drainage work
by the contractors. Cllr D.
Ricardo responded that this was unlikely to take place
until next year due to expiry of guarantee. 2.
Mr N. Probert of High Road, speaking on behalf of the residents
present stated that they were opposed to the demolition of the house
called ‘Bramleys’ and the erection of two semi-detached houses
(Planning Application 04/ 41653).
The new development was of inappropriate size and excessive height
(9 metres), would cause loss of privacy to the surrounding neighbours,
increase traffic density at a dangerous corner and result in serious
parking problems. 3.
Mrs H. Brodie supported Mr Probert’s remarks and added that the
development posed a further problem regarding the safety of children. 4.
Mr N. Darling amplified the parking problem and stated that at
present, cars were parked in front of his access, causing serious problems
to his invalid wife. 5.
Mr M. Wellman (speaking from the floor) raised the problem of
speeding traffic at the junction of Hillcrest and Windmill Road and asked
if what he considered is a dangerous junction could be marked out by the
Royal Borough. Concern
was also expressed over the serious parking problem in this area when
football matches were taking place on the Alfred Major Ground.
The Chairman stated that these matters would be considered further
at a later date.
6.
Mr G. Feeney of ‘The Holt’, Stubbles Lane, stated that his
Planning Application 04/41627 had now been withdrawn. The Chairman thanked
him for this information and agreed to withdraw the application from the
agenda, even though no confirmation had been received from the Planning
Officer concerned. 1.
APOLOGIES AND DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST:
Apologies were received
from Cllrs: M. Innes, R. Piercey and J. Stretton. Cllrs M. Brar and D.
Ricardo declared an interest in the Planning Agenda as they were both
Borough Councillors. Also,
Cllr Ricardo declared a prejudicial interest in Application No 04/41624 as
he lived adjacent to the property concerned and left the meeting room.
2. PLANS CONSIDERED & DISCUSSED:
WORKS TO TREES IN CONSERVATION AREA:
3. MINUTES AND MATTERS ARISING: The minutes of the Planning Meetings held on the 2nd and 16th March 2004 were circulated and duly agreed with two corrections. On Page 844 of the minutes of the meeting on the 16th March, Planning Application 04/41554, the Comment should have read that the new fencing is NOT in keeping with the Conservation Area rather than is in keeping. Secondly, under Application 04/41565, the plural for “Antennae” is “Antennaes” The Meeting closed at 8.35 pm.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|